A Publication of the
Vol.7, Issue 3
=======================================================
From time to time the question of "who
is a disciple" of Christ comes to the fore front. To know how one "makes" disciples
one must look at Pentecost (Acts 2) and beyond. Why? Because Acts 2 records how
on the Day of Pentecost, in
"And said unto them, Thus it is
written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the
third day: [47] And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in
his name among all nations, beginning at
Notice that the apostles would
"begin" in Jersualem and that repentance and remission of sins would
be preached in His name to all nations. (Luke 24:46-49). Whatever one was taught prior to Pentecost
with regard to even baptism, Mark 1:4, did not make them a christian or disciple as a result of the teaching of the
great commission to baptize in Jesus name. Prior to Pentecost (Acts 2) and the
command to be baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ" (Acts
As one reads through the book of Acts they
see the same pattern as a result of preaching the Gospel.
Saul's
Conversion
Ananias was said to be a
"disciple" and he baptized Saul in order that he might be too (Acts
Certain
"disciples"
In Acts 19:1 Paul found certain
"disciples," it says. These were "not" disciples as a
result of the great commission (Luke 24:47). Obviously, they were disciples as
a result who had taught them and what they had been taught. That
"what" is specified here as John's baptism. Included with this is the
fact that John taught that people should believe on Him who would come after
him, i.e., on Christ Jesus. These were not "disciples" in the same
sense as the above conversions (Acts 2
conversions, "church" in
(Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; Mark
Apollos
In Acts 18 we read about Apollos. There is
enough recorded here to show that Apolos (like those Paul baptized in Acts 19)
knew "who" Jesus was, for he spoke accurately some things concerning
Him. But Apollos was NOT a disciple like Acquila and Priscilla though having
been instructed and believing (Acts
Others Not Yet
Saved
Concerning this matter of making or not
making disciples, I read about some who heard and even believed but were NOT
disciples. In Acts 24:24-25 Felix heard and understood, which is one step above
just "hearing," but he was no disciple! In Acts 26 Paul preached to
King Agrippa and said to him "I know that you do believe" the
prophets. Prior to that Paul has explained what the prophets and Moses had said
would come -- "that the Christ would suffer, that He would be the first to
rise from the dead, and would proclaim light to the Jewish people and to the
Gentiles." (Acts 26:22-23) Here is an example of one hearing and even
believing but this did not make Agrippa a disciple.
Disciples
Called "Christians"
These example of conversion and
non-conversion from Pentecost onwards show who did become a
"disciple" of Christ. Those who did become "disciples" were
called "Christians" first in
Since we are 2000 years plus removed from
Pentecost the answer should be clear with no confusion at all about those who
had been taught about Jesus, like Apollos, but who did not have the full
teaching. Apollos and those referred to in Acts 19 lived at a transition period
when John was the forerunner of the Messiah. The baptism of John was operative
during this period of time. One shows
the weakness of their argument when they depend upon the events of that
"transition period" to claim that there are true disciples of Christ
today without the obedience of Acts 2:41.
In the context of all that has been said
consider the words of Jesus in John 8:31-32, "Then Jesus said to those
Jews who believed Him, 'If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed.
And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."